下面是學習啦小編整理的雅思高分作文范文， 希望對大家有幫助。

　　雅思大作文題目：

　　You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

　　Children should never be educated at home by theirparents. Do you agree or disagree?

　　Discuss the advantages and disadvantages foryoung people who decide to do this.

　　You should write at least 250 words.

　　雅思大作文范文：

　　Nobody can say with confidence that childrenshould be taught at home or at any children'sinstitutions. There are many different children andevery one demand of education suitable only forhim.

　　But for most of children the best way of learning thelife is being in the children's institutions. Nobodywould argue that contacts between children of thesame age are very important for bringing your child up. Such a contact is very important forplaying, entertaining and learning living with other people. The harmonious living with otherpeople, to my mind, is the first task for any man. Lack of this harmony sets problems andtroubles.

　　The children need space to run and make noise, to jump and cry. Do you or your neighboursallow these actions for your child? If you live in town, it is difficult to find a safe place to play.Kindergartens give such a possibility. They give space, a lot of toys and constructions forphysical exercises. So, if you have bad living conditions, the kindergarten is the best way foryou. But if you have a large family with many children and enough space, you may keep yourchild at home. You should be sure that the child feels, dressed and comfortable. His brothersand sisters give him necessary contacts. It's noticed long ago that children in big families aremuch more easy-tempered and calm. They are located in more harmonic world than others.

　　Sometimes differences in age put troubles in contacts between children in large families. Then itis better for child to be sent to the kindergarten (school). But if quarrels don't last for a longtime, everything is all right. In general, quarrels develop ability to cooperate with people. Theydevelop a personal initiative and force setting the balance. In such a way the child gets lessonsof life. Addly, the quarrels often take place in kindergartens and schools and we shouldn't fearit.

　　Side by side with quarrels parents often are afraid of colds which happen in kindergartens morefrequently. Parents prefer keeping the child at home. But for a healthy child odd cold (if illnessoccurs, it goes its normal course) can't make big harm to the child. And if the child is adaptableto the conditions of public places earlier it would be better for him in future.

　　In general, I am a follower of the theory of keeping children in adapted places such as goodkindergartens. But keeping children in such a place can't replace family and home. Onlytogether they make harmonic and beautiful union.

　　雅思大作文題目：

　　You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

　　Scientists and the news media are presenting evermore evidence of climate change. Governmnetscannot be expected to solve this problem. It is theresponsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle toprevent further damage.

　　What are your views?

　　You should write at least 250 words.

　　Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge orexperience.

　　雅思大作文范文：

　　Recently scientists worried about climate changehave urged governments to introduce measures toreduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are seenas its main cause. Simoultaneouslty, politicians andenvironmentalists have urged individuals to makechanges to their lifestyle. I shall argue thatgovernments and individuals should take joinresponsibility for this problem.

　　Firstly, industry accounts for a large proportion of the greenhouse gas emissions, and thiscan only be controlled by government action. Measures could be taken to discouragepollution, such as limiting or taxing the use of fossil fuels. Alternatively, subsidies could beoffered to industries to clean up their production processes. If these ideas were adopted, Ibelieve that businesses would regard pollution as a financial issue.

　　Secondly, only discussion between governments can ensure that solutions are successful. TheKyoto agreement, for example, tried to reach global agreement on how to address theproblem. Without such co-operating, it seems to me that efforts to reduce fuel consumptionare unlikely to be effective.

　　However, national and international policies will only secceed if individuals also change theirlifestyle. For example, people could think more carefully about how they use energy in theirhomes. By using less electricity, installing energy-efficient light bulbs and electrical appliances,or investing in solar panels, individuals can make a real difference.

　　In addition, I think individual attitudes to transport need to change. Instead of making shorttips by car, people could choose to walk, cycle, or take a bus. Since cars are a major source ofthe problem, changing our behaviour in this area would have a major impact.

　　In conclusion, I would maintain that only a combination of international agreement, nationalpolicies, and changes in individual behaviour will succeed in preventing further damage to theenvironment.