雅思寫作的提高不僅需要自己勤加練習(xí)，還要多讀多看，下面是學(xué)習(xí)啦小編為您整理的雅思大作文范文，僅供參考，希望考生能從中受到啟發(fā)，提高自己的雅思寫作成績!

　　雅思大作文題目：援助貧困國家

　　Afflicted with famine, wars, diseases, peopleliving in those poverty-stricken countries arestruggling for survival. From Vietnam to Burma,from Ethiopia to Cambodia, what they worry about iswhere is the next meal, how to save the long-suffering family’s life and what next day will be. Inface of this severe situation, it is suggested thatrich countries should shoulder responsibility to helpthem out of such harsh situation.

　　The opponents are of the opinion that this well-meant aid may engender unfavorableeffects on the current situation. To begin with, those aids are likely to be misused by localofficials. Surprising is that the poorer a country is, the higher possibility of its government’scorruption, which is, actually, the root cause for its backwardness. To make it worse, citizens,once granted food and daily necessities alike, are prone to produce strong independence andreliance. It is universally acknowledged that only those countries thriving for advance on theirown can really make a difference. Once the counting-on habit, which serves as a barrier tofurther development, is formed, to eliminate it will be a tough job.

　　However, proponents also have strong reasons. Primarily, the supports, financially andtechnologically, have turned out to be of high importance to boosting economy of poor nations.For example, powerful economies, like France, Britain, America to name just a few, can invest indomestic industries, so that more job opportunities are brought and living standard enhanced.Furthermore, it is a win-win strategy to reach out an aiding hand. Without doubt, moderntechnology enables the world shrink into a Village, therefore, with a few villagers suffering, anoverall prosperity is nothing but a Utopia. That is to say only when hunger is conquered,when wars are quenched globally can the real comprehensive prosperity be achieved. Mostimportant of all, those super powers, historically, were major contributors to the currenttrauma of those have-nots.

　　Overall, rich countries are definitely duty-bound to help their poor counterparts out. For onething, it mirrors the humanism; for another, it is an indispensable procedure in realization ofglobal peace and flourish.

　　雅思大作文題目：國際經(jīng)濟(jì)文化交流

　　Some people say that the increasing businessand cultural contract between countries has apositive effect; others say it could contribute to aloss of the countries identities. Do you agree oragree or disagree.

　　Our world is changing but the questions seem toremain the same; is increased contact betweencultures leading to cultural destruction? Well maybeit is, and, maybe it isn't. And maybe that is a goodthing, and maybe it isn't. But what ever is happening we have to understand that we cannotcontrol it, nor change it, but rather we have to get used to it.

　　In this modern world there are so many possibilities; many people can live how they wishand where they wish. People choose to take up any identity that they want; in China somewesterners embrace Chinese culture, whilst their Chinese neighbours are wearing Nike andeating at KFC. So it is hard to say if this is cultural loss or not. (Are American's committingcultural suicide with their KFC and McDonalds food?) The world is far more complex than we tryto make out.

　　And why are we so protective of our culture? (Chinese foot-binding, amongst other things,are cultural artifacts which we would rather forget.) Why can't the new things we create also bevaluable? Trying to preserve the old ways when they may be unsuitable for our future or oursurvival seems ridiculous. We need to move forward to survive. Increased contact with othercountries and cultures is part of that movement forward.

　　But we will create new things if we give people freedom and resources to do so. I say letpeople loose, let our culture free; don’t try to hold it back or control it, for surely you will onlykill it. Let's embrace all forms of change; don't worry we can reject them later.

　　雅思大作文題目：世界用水量及消費(fèi)量

　　The graph and table illustrate respectivelyinformation about worldwide water use by sector over a span of 100 years from 1900 to 2000and water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000.

　　As can be seen from the graph, global water use in three different sectors, namely,agriculture, industry and household clearly reveals two trends in the past century: slow increaseand fast increase. Comparing figures of the two sampled countries, we see that the differencesbetween Brazil and Congo were just huge.

　　Firstly, 1900-1950 was a trend of increase. Agricultural water use gradually increased fromthe original 500,000 cubic meters to 1,000,000 cubic meters in 1950. That of industrial andhousehold use remained almost unchanged, only rising from almost zero in 1900 to 500 cubicmeters and 200 cubic meters respectively in 1950.

　　Secondly, around 1950, agricultural water use entered a period of substantial increase,jumping from 1,000,000 cubic meters to 1,500,000 cubic meters in 1960. Afterwards, theincrease slowed down slightly, but then gained even stronger momentum and by 2000, it hadreached 3,000,000 cubic meters. After 1950, industrial water use also began to increasegreatly, arriving at 800,000 cubic meters in 1985. Then it continued to increase at an evenbigger rate and reached 1,200,000 cubic meters in 2000. Household water consumption startedto increase a little bit faster between 1950-1970, rising from 200 cubic meters to 400 cubicmeters, then the increase accelerated and quickly climbed to 300,000 cubic meters in 2000.

　　Thirdly, from the table, we see the huge disparities between Brazil and Congo inpopulation, irrigated land area and the average water consumption per person. Thepopulation of Brazil was over 170 million more than that of Congo, its irrigated land area was265 times that of Congo, and its average water consumption per person was almost 45 timesthat of Congo.

　　All in all, after having analyzed the graph and the table, we may safely draw the conclusionthat water is playing an increasingly important role in every aspect of our lives and that thewater consumption gap between the two sampled countries indicates that the more developed acountry is, the more water it will consume.