說(shuō)到雅思機(jī)經(jīng)，考生們一定不會(huì)陌生，甚至常常成為津津樂(lè)道的話題。針對(duì)雅思寫(xiě)作考試，很多考生都將“寶”壓在雅思寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)上。那么對(duì)于雅思寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)我們究竟該怎么做呢?我們究竟應(yīng)該如何正確的使用雅思寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)呢?雅思寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)的使用誤區(qū)究竟在哪里?下面是小編為您收集整理的雅思寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)的使用誤區(qū)，供大家參考!

　　雅思寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)的使用誤區(qū)

　　1、對(duì)寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)死記硬背

　　很多考生都有一種“背水一戰(zhàn)”的“悲壯”信念，所以才會(huì)將大量的時(shí)間都花費(fèi)在機(jī)經(jīng)的背誦上，這樣單純的死記硬背不僅不會(huì)有任何作用，還是徒勞的，如果在考前沒(méi)有完成所有任務(wù)，那么考生心理上就會(huì)非常地不安，從而影響考場(chǎng)上正常發(fā)揮。

　　2、投機(jī)取巧

　　很多考生對(duì)于考前的預(yù)測(cè)機(jī)經(jīng)都有一種投機(jī)取巧的心里，考前不是踏踏實(shí)實(shí)地準(zhǔn)備相關(guān)的詞匯、句型和寫(xiě)作素材，而是追著老師或者通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)等各種方式獲取預(yù)測(cè)，準(zhǔn)備幾篇文章，然后抱著“中獎(jiǎng)”心理走上考場(chǎng)。這樣的心里是很可怕的，純屬玩票的態(tài)度即使在考前也可以預(yù)料到結(jié)局。

　　小編建議各位考生避免盲目迷信，學(xué)會(huì)科學(xué)有效地使用寫(xiě)作機(jī)經(jīng)，定能在考雅道路上助廣大考生一臂之力。以上就是小編總結(jié)的關(guān)于，希望可以幫助到大家。

　　考官華麗雅思小作文詳解

　　Simon是英國(guó)曼徹斯特的前雅思考官，由于創(chuàng)辦雅思考試學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)站而在全世界的考生中越來(lái)越有名氣。其網(wǎng)站上提供大量關(guān)于復(fù)習(xí)雅思的技巧以及顛覆性的建議，甚至還有不少Simon本人親筆寫(xiě)的滿分作文。這些滿分作文由于出自英國(guó)考官之手，非常地道，言簡(jiǎn)意賅，和中國(guó)考生慣用的千篇一律的模板作文相比，著實(shí)讓人眼前一亮。

　　話不多說(shuō)，我們來(lái)看這樣一個(gè)小作文：

　　The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984.

　　看到這樣一個(gè)圖形大家會(huì)覺(jué)得這道題很難吧，Simon看到題目時(shí)這樣說(shuō)，“I found this one difficult, so don't worry if you did too!”。所以大家別怕，連雅思考官都說(shuō)難呢!

　　我們先來(lái)分析一下，該圖描述的是法國(guó)和印度兩個(gè)國(guó)家的不同年齡的人群所占的比例。從圖中我們可以看出，印度人口顯然比法國(guó)整體上要年輕，因?yàn)?0歲以下印度的人口占了相當(dāng)大的比例;而法國(guó)呢，則上年紀(jì)的人居多。

　　再說(shuō)得細(xì)致點(diǎn)，印度小于五歲的人口占了14%%uFF0C從上往下隨著年紀(jì)呈遞增趨勢(shì);法國(guó)相對(duì)就比較分散了，0到40歲的人似乎都在7%%u81F38%%u4E4B間波動(dòng)。70歲以上人口法國(guó)大概有15%%uFF0C而印度只有2%%u3002

　　然后我們?cè)賮?lái)說(shuō)性別，50歲以上的法國(guó)女人顯著比法國(guó)男人比例高，而印度人口在男女比例上卻看不出顯著不同。

　　分析完了思路，我們馬上來(lái)看一下Simon寫(xiě)的這篇滿分作文吧!

　　The two charts compare the populations of France and India in terms of age distribution by gender in the year 1984.(第一段不需要太長(zhǎng)，簡(jiǎn)單明了，留下好印象，提起考官興趣。)

　　It is clear that the population of India was younger than that of France in 1984, with a noticeably larger proportion of people aged under 20. France, on the other hand, had a significantly larger percentage of elderly inhabitants.(先介紹兩個(gè)國(guó)家整體上最明顯的對(duì)比)

　　In India, close to 14% of people were aged 5 or under, and each five-year age bracket above this contained an increasingly smaller proportion of the population. France’s population, by contrast, was more evenly distributed across the age ranges, with similar figures (around 7% to 8% of all people) for each five-year cohort between the ages of 0 and 40. Somewhere between 10% and 15% of all French people were aged 70 or older, but the equivalent figure for India was only 2%.(詳細(xì)分析兩個(gè)國(guó)家差別最明顯的年齡群體并以詳實(shí)的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行描述)

　　Looking more closely at gender, there was a noticeably higher proportion of French women than men in every cohort from age 50 upwards. For example, almost 3% of French 70- to 75-year-olds were women, while just under 2% were men. No significant gender differences can be seen on the Indian population chart.(最后不忘從性別的角度去分析人口比例的差距。圖表中信息已經(jīng)全部展現(xiàn)，無(wú)須結(jié)尾)

　　(199 words, band 9)