特黄特色三级在线观看免费,看黄色片子免费,色综合久,欧美在线视频看看,高潮胡言乱语对白刺激国产,伊人网成人,中文字幕亚洲一碰就硬老熟妇

學(xué)習(xí)啦>學(xué)習(xí)英語(yǔ)>英語(yǔ)知識(shí)大全>

GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享

時(shí)間: 楚薇0 分享

為了幫助大家備考gre。了解更多關(guān)于gre的知識(shí),打有準(zhǔn)備的仗,下面小編給大家?guī)?lái)GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享,希望大家喜歡。

GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享

第一段:開(kāi)頭段。主要是歸納論點(diǎn),說(shuō)明論點(diǎn)有問(wèn)題,存在邏輯漏洞,準(zhǔn)備發(fā)起進(jìn)攻。

第一層:

This argument concludes/recommends/argues that…

第二層:

To support this conclusion the writer cites…/points out that…

第三層:

However, this argument suffers from several critical flaws and is therefore unconvincing/ unpersuasive as it stands.

第二段和第三段甚至第四段:分類(lèi)別去攻擊各個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤。(以因果關(guān)系類(lèi)錯(cuò)誤為例)

One problem with the argument is that, the editorial observes a correlation between… and …, then concludes that the former is the cause of the latter. However, the editorial fails to rule out other possible explanations for…For example,… Any of these factors, or other social, political or economic factors, might lead to…Without ruling out all other such factors it is unfair to conclude that…

第五段:結(jié)尾段。

作者的結(jié)論似乎是合理的,但是通過(guò)論證,不是這樣的。因此作者在做出決定之前,應(yīng)該還要考慮其他情況。我們通過(guò)一篇文章作為實(shí)例來(lái)介紹Argument的論證步驟和論證方法以及文章結(jié)構(gòu)。

In the final analysis, the letter's author fails to adequately support the recommendation that…To bolster the argument, the arguer must provide detailed demographic/statistical evidence showing that…The author must also provide evidence--perhaps by way of a reliable survey—that…

GRE寫(xiě)作滿分范文1

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

At?first?look,?this?seems?to?be?a?very?well?presented?arguement.??A?logical?path?is?followed?throughout?the?paragraph?and?the?conclusion?is?expected.??However,?upon?a?second?consideration,?it?is?apparent?that?all?possibilities?were?not?considered?when?the?author?presented?his?conclusion?(or?at?least?that?s/he?did?not?present?all?of?the?possibilities).?There?are?numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestville?increased.??Although?it?seems?logical?to?assume?that?the?difference?in?the?percentage?of?accidents?was?due?to?the?difference?in?whether?or?not?the?speed?limit?had?been?increased?during?the?specified?month,?this?does?not?necessarily?mean?that?the?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?originally?was?in?Forestville.??The?author?does?not?state?two?specific?pieces?of?information?that?are?important?before?a?conclusion?such?as?the?one?the?author?made?is?sound.??The?first?is?that?it?is?not?expressed?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?neighboring?regions?had?had?the?same?speed?limit?before?Forestville's?speed?limit?had?been?increased.??If?they?had?originally?been?the?same,?then?it?is?reasonable?to?conclude?that?Forestville's?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??However,?if?the?two?region's?speed?limits?were?initially?different,?then?such?a?conclusion?can?not?be?made.??The?second?piece?of?information?that?is?necessary?for?the?present?argument?is?the?relative?number?of?accidents?in?each?of?the?areas?prior?to?the?increase?in?speed?limit.??For?the?author?to?make?the?presented?conclusion,?the?number?of?accidents?should?have?been?approximately?equal?prior?to?the?increase?in?the?speed?limit?in?Forestville.??If?the?two?missing?pieces?of?information?had?been?presented?and?were?in?the?author's?favor,?then?the?conclusion?that?the?author?made?would?have?been?much?more?sound?than?it?currently?is.??In?conclusion,?the?argument?is?not?entirely?well?reasoned,?but?given?the?information?that?was?expressed?in?the?paragraph,?it?was?presented?well,?and?in?a?logical?order.?Comments:?

This?competent?critique?claims?that?there?are?"numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestville?increased."??However,?the?author discusses?only?two?points:??

--?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?regions?were?originally?the?same;????and?

--?the?number?of?accidents?in?each?region?prior?to?Forestville's????raising?the?speed?limit.??

Although?the?response?appears?at?first?to?be?well?developed,?there?is?much?less?analysis?here?than?the?length?would?suggest.??The?first?third?and?last?third?of?the?essay?are?relatively?insubstantial,?consisting?mainly?of?general?summary?statements?(e.g.,?"A?logical?path????conclusion?is?expected"?and?"If?the?two????more?sound?than?it?currently?is").??The?real?heart?of?the?critique?consists?of?minimal?development?of?the?two?points?mentioned?above.??Therefore,?although?two?important?features?of?the?argument?are?analyzed?and?the?writer?handles?language?and?syntax?adequately,?the?lack?of?substantial?development?keeps?this?critique?from?earning?a?score?higher?than?4.

GRE寫(xiě)作滿分范文2

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

This?argument?does?not?have?any?concrete?information.??It?seems?by?Forestville,?increasing?their?speed?limit?more?accidents?occured.??We?all?know?that?accidents?occur?reguardless?of?what?the?speed?limit?of?the?highway?we?travel.??Fortunately,?Elmsford's?accidents?decreased?during?the?six-months?in?discussion.??This?could?be?because?of?good?weather,?careful?drivers,?or?any?number?of?situations.??On?the?other?hand,?Forrestville?had?an?increase?in?accidents.??The?only?determining?factor?given?was?the?speed?limit?increasing.?This?in?fact?probably?did?play?a?big?role?in?why?there?was?a?15%?percent?increase?in?the?accidents,?but?may?not?be?the?only?factor.???In?order?to?make?an?accurate?judgement?on?why?there?was?an?increase?in?automobile?accidents?the?situation??needs?to?be?researched.?Solid?facts?need?to?be?stated.???Clearly,?to?reduce?the?speed?limit?back?to?normal?in?Forrestville?would?not?eliminate?the?problem.?Comments:?

This?limited?critique?is?plainly?flawed.??The?author?begins?with?a?criticism?about?the?lack?of?"concrete?information"?but?then?fails?to?provide?any?concrete?analysis?in?the?response.??The?writer?cites?the?drop?in?Elmsford's?accidents?but?does?not?develop?any?of?the?reasons?mentioned?to?account?for?the?drop:?"good?weather,?careful?drivers,?or?any?number?of?situations."??

The?writer?then?goes?on?to?discuss?Forestville?and?suggests?that?the?speed?limit?"may?not?be?the?only?factor,"?but?this?point?is?not?developed?either.??The?author?issues?a?generic?call?for?more?research?and?facts?and?offers?an?unsupported?conclusion?of?his?or?her?own:?"Clearly,?to?reduce?the?speed?limit?

would?not?eliminate?the?problem."??Although?the?author?appears?to?know?that?there?is?something?wrong?with?the?argument,?he?or?she?does?not?seem?to?know?how?to?critique?the?argument?in?greater?detail.??

The?response?demonstrates?adequate?control?of?the?elements?of?writing,?but?the?analysis?is?so?underdeveloped?that?it?cannot?earn?a?score?higher?than?3.?

GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享相關(guān)文章:

GRE寫(xiě)作5.5分經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享

GRE高頻作文及參考范文

托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作經(jīng)驗(yàn)大總

gre高分作文集錦

看新GRE30天復(fù)習(xí)技巧如何高效背單詞

新GRE考試寫(xiě)作如何進(jìn)行復(fù)習(xí)

gre閱讀做題技巧超全

GRE閱讀一個(gè)SECTION題型數(shù)量分配情況解析

GRE備考資料匯總

GRE閱讀思路這里梳理

GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享

為了幫助大家備考gre。了解更多關(guān)于gre的知識(shí),打有準(zhǔn)備的仗,下面小編給大家?guī)?lái)GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享,希望大家喜歡。GRE寫(xiě)作Argument經(jīng)典結(jié)構(gòu)分享第一段:開(kāi)頭段。主要是歸納論點(diǎn),說(shuō)明論點(diǎn)有問(wèn)題,存在邏輯漏洞,準(zhǔn)備發(fā)起進(jìn)攻。第一層:This argument concludes/recommends/argues that…第二層:To support this conclusion the writer cites…/points out that…第三層:Howev
推薦度:
點(diǎn)擊下載文檔文檔為doc格式

精選文章

  • GRE作文3分容易考么
    GRE作文3分容易考么

    GRE考試中,寫(xiě)作部分的總分值為6分,那么如果作文想要拿到3分的成績(jī),是容易還是難呢?具體的在備考的過(guò)程中,同學(xué)們應(yīng)該怎么備考,才能夠拿到GRE寫(xiě)作

  • gre分類(lèi)詞匯整理大全
    gre分類(lèi)詞匯整理大全

    為了幫助大家備考gre。了解更多關(guān)于gre的知識(shí),打有準(zhǔn)備的的仗,下面小編給大家?guī)?lái)gre分類(lèi)詞匯匯總。gre分類(lèi)詞匯1-各種劑arraign v 指責(zé),傳訊,彈劾

  • GRE考試名詞動(dòng)詞介紹
    GRE考試名詞動(dòng)詞介紹

    為了幫助大家備考gre。了解更多關(guān)于gre的知識(shí),打有準(zhǔn)備的仗,下面小編給大家?guī)?lái)GRE考試名詞動(dòng)詞介紹,希望大家喜歡。GRE考試名詞動(dòng)詞介紹1、目的關(guān)系

  • 想要出國(guó)讀研,GRE到底有多難
    想要出國(guó)讀研,GRE到底有多難

    GRE鍛煉的不僅是殺G黨們的智商,更是情商...很多同學(xué)表示:自從學(xué)了GRE,以前很多看不開(kāi)的事情,現(xiàn)在都能看開(kāi)了...下面小編給大家?guī)?lái)想要出國(guó)讀研,

487640