雅思寫作論據(jù)怎么寫
在雅思大作文考試中，一般會(huì)給出大家一個(gè)具體的觀點(diǎn)，要求大家對(duì)這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)來(lái)表達(dá)自己的看法，并且需要結(jié)合一些論證論據(jù)來(lái)讓自己的觀點(diǎn)更有說(shuō)服力。那么如何來(lái)運(yùn)用這些論據(jù)，接下來(lái)小編來(lái)舉些例子，希望能幫助大家理解。
雅思寫作論據(jù)怎么寫
(一)局限于自己或朋友的例子。此類例子往往缺乏客觀性和說(shuō)服力，由于人稱的局限導(dǎo)致所敘述事件難免“雞毛蒜皮”。要明白，個(gè)人不代表整體。
例：I keep my dog to avoid my loneliness and I find a lot of fun.
這樣的例子讓人猶如在看記敘文，和議論文很不搭調(diào)。
(二)引用過(guò)多數(shù)據(jù)。太多專業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)會(huì)給人捏造的痕跡，缺乏真實(shí)性?？脊贂?huì)質(zhì)疑數(shù)據(jù)的出處。
例：A survey indicates that the number of people smoking has increased to as high as 65 percent in China.(一項(xiàng)調(diào)查顯示。。。)
"65%"讓文章看起來(lái)有些假，有捏造的嫌疑。"A survey"又不夠具有代表性。
(三)中國(guó)式的例子。一個(gè)國(guó)家同樣難代表世界。雅思是international的考試，不應(yīng)將范圍框的太局限。此外考官來(lái)自各個(gè)國(guó)家，過(guò)分使用一個(gè)國(guó)家的例子會(huì)引起他們的反感。
例：Many children in China like to play computer games for a long time, leading to their poor eyesight.
只需小小改動(dòng)便可成為成功范例。
因此，首先考生應(yīng)了解，舉例是一種常見的論述方式，特別在論述某一些比較抽象的話題的時(shí)候(比如文化類或跟藝術(shù)相關(guān)的話題)。但是，并不是每個(gè)段落都需要例證法，舉例過(guò)多或過(guò)分牽強(qiáng)會(huì)影響文章的正式感，甚至給考官喋喋不休的感覺。
舉例是為了更加形象地?cái)⑹鍪虑?。提醒考生們要注意以下原則：
(一) 要來(lái)源于生活，要具有生動(dòng)的論述效果。不能過(guò)于空洞，也不能脫離現(xiàn)時(shí)，否則就失去了舉例的意義。
(二) 要客觀表達(dá)。雖然來(lái)源于身邊社會(huì)，但不可讓描述方式變的太雞毛蒜皮，拿不上臺(tái)面。其實(shí)這點(diǎn)非常容易辦到，只需要把事件中某一個(gè)具體的你，我，他，變成是客觀群體，比如說(shuō)people across the globe, students, they之類的人稱即可。
舉例的常見表達(dá)方式：
for example,/for instance,(后加句子)
Such as/ like (后加詞組)
Take... as an example,
A case in point is that......
雅思寫作范文：傳統(tǒng)文化消失
With the development of modern science and technology, some aspects of traditional culture are being lost, so some people think that traditional culture will be replaced by the modern science and technology, such as computers and the Internet. What is your opinion?
No matter how conservative you are, you will find your life is changing gradually with the rapid development of science and technology. While many of us are enjoying the conveniences that are brought to our daily lives, some pessimists start to worry that traditional culture and will be replaced totally by these developments. I do believe that modern science and technology are improvements and the off-spring of traditional culture and technology. However, the old merits should never diminish.
Innovations such as computers and the Internet help us to find more practical ways to preserve our traditional culture and technology. Take e-cards as an example: By sending e-card during festivals, people could save a great amount of money instead of buying the paper-based cards and stamps. We no longer have to plan weeks ahead and worry whether these cards would arrive on time, e-cards could pass our wishes in seconds, and moreover, this simple way could also prevent millions of trees from being cut down for making paper cards. E-cards functions the same as traditional paper cards by sending our goodwill and wishes. Modern technology, at this point, assists our traditions in finding a better way of existing in modern life.
On the other hand, with the increasingly wide use of modern technology, people tend to rely more on modern tools. Unduly relying on these tools might also cause negligence of traditional culture and technology in some aspects. Some children and adolescents are most vulnerable to the influences of these high technologies. Some spend hours on line making friends with strangers or playing games. However, the ability of chatting on line can never replace the interpersonal skills of face-to-face communication, and playing with digital figures can never replace the social skills that are required in social life.
Admittedly, the overwhelming science and technology development is changing our lives astonishingly. But these developments should work to support the traditional culture and technology rather than replace them. Scientists and sociologists should work together to enhance the advantages of modern developments and control the abuse of modern tools. [CKQ]Modern Technology internet--- book or written words.
With the rapid development of modern technology, increasing amount of data and information is transferred and restored through internet. However, I am not a believer in the argument that internet or any other modern technology would replace the book or the written words.
Firstly, books and written words comparably require fewer resources to spread information and are more convenient to users. People have to own computers or access to internet to be able to open or read the electronic data. If all the books and written words were replaced by the electronic data, there would be no doubt that more people would become illiterate. Thus, reading and writing would become limited to those privileged ones who could afford to buy computers. Moreover, it could be very handy to bring a book while traveling or at places where electric power is inaccessible.
Secondly, it would be really difficult for people to control the access of electronic data and guarantee the validity. As we all know books have to be seriously reviewed by authorities before they would be able to be published. However, in the digital world, anyone can upload or post information on the website that could be visited freely by millions of people world wide. What will happen if the only access of information is replaced by these electronic versions? Teachers or parents would be frustrated, because they could not control the source of information that children read and study with.
In general, electronic data could and should never replace the original written information, although they much easier and quicker to convey. I do not think books and original written information would diminish before scientists could invent methods to control the drawbacks of electronic data.[CKQ]Tourism
Tourism is developing rapidly during the 21st Century and becoming mainstay of many cities and towns with low development on other industries. However, pessimistic stated that the rapid development might pose great pressure on local recourses and will cause great negative impacts on local environment and culture. The implication and veracity of this statement seem self-evident but the logical fallacy that might contained in the above statement require close examination.
First and most important. Any human development would cause changes to environment and culture, however, the development of tourism should not be the only target to be blamed, and it also comparably case less negative changes. Other industries such as manufacturing and modern farming would deplete the local resources and cause much more environmental concerns. Development manufacturing may cause serious air pollution, water pollution and destroying of traditional manufacturing. Development of modern farming could cause soil erosion, simplify of local species and irreversible damage to local ecosystem. On the contrary, People wherever they live have their own desire to make more money and to improve their lives. Development of tourism could make great profits to local residences and at the same time make them aware the value of natural environment and their traditions.
Secondly, the changes of local culture could be better preserved with the sensible development of tourism. The nature of tourism is exploring exotic culture and sightseeing wonderful landscape. The curiousness of the visitors could make the local people to realize the treasure they are entitled----- traditional culture and technology. No one would destroy the chicken if it can produce golden eggs. The profits from the tourism would by no means to support the local people sustain and live in their original way.
The revenue could also help the local people to preserve the cultures, for example, the money could be used to refurnish old traditional architectures or set up museums.
In general, well organized tourism development plan can be great profitable while unplanned developments of tourism may cause bad effects locally. Over-construction of recreational facilities could cause damage to local scenery. Solid pollution could be caused by large flow of uncontrolled tourists. Local government and travel agencies that involved in the development must try to eliminate or reduce the bad impacts that can be controlled, even if there is no 100% proof that a certain impact is directly related to a tourist activity.
雅思寫作范文：看電視影響孩子的創(chuàng)造力
Is watching TV harmful or beneficial for children’s creativity?
TV is an essential part of leisure activities in most families. However, some parents decide not to have a TV set in their homes, in order that their children will devote enough time to invention and creation.
Do you agree or disagree with this attitude?
The invention of television, one of the products of modern civilization, has made an enormous change in the lifestyle of human beings. TV has been playing more and more important role in most families after work. Yet, as to whether it is a blessing or a curse, parents often hold widely different opinions and take totally different attitudes.
There is suspicion in some parents’ minds that TV might retard their children’s creative ability or restrain kids’ imagination because TV viewers tend to receive information in a passive way instead of discovering things by themselves. Although people working in the TV industry have made lots of efforts to produce various programs, the outcome is usually unsatisfactory: either the program is too profound to be understood or the topic is not interesting enough to attract TV audiences. Thus, watching TV is hardly a good way to inspire children’s creativity. In many cases, it can draw attention away from their studies and spoil their school education.(From:www.cnielts.com)
Despite the negative effects that TV produces, many parents still think that TV programs are quite helpful to their children’s mental development because these programs can broaden their horizons and enrich their life experiences. Admittedly, some scientific, detective and documental programs like Discovery and National Geographic are so enlightening and fascinating that even little kids can be absorbed in. Furthermore, some well-chosen programs can motivate young children to diligent studies and in-depth researches. Hence, if parents can select TV programs carefully, the advantages brought about by watching TV definitely outweigh its disadvantages.
In summary, TV is like a double-edged sword that can be used in a positive or negative way. Parents can make their own decisions about whether to have TV at their houses. It is their responsibility to make sure that their children’s creativity is enhanced through watching TV.
雅思寫作論據(jù)怎么寫相關(guān)文章：