“GRE寫作成績在申請當中占的比重大嗎?”“我申請理工科，GRE寫作是不是3分就夠了?！薄拔目茖I(yè)的GRE寫作成績是不是要達到4分以上?”這些關于GRE寫作成績的問題都是同學們在申請時常常遇到的困惑。今天 這篇文章中集中為大家解答申請當中GRE寫作要求相關的3個問題。

想申請Top30，GRE寫作成績到底多少分才夠?

1. 理工科同學GRE作文的平均線是多少?

學校會把錄取學生的GRE作文平均分放到官網(wǎng)上，同學們的目標就是要達到甚至超過平均線。而排名前30的理工科專業(yè)，GRE寫作的平均線都高于3.5。

根據(jù)小G君今年統(tǒng)計的申請數(shù)據(jù)，計算機/金融工程/商業(yè)分析這三大熱門專業(yè)，超過80%的錄取者GRE寫作成績都在3.5以上，金工專業(yè)前30的錄取者，將近一半的同學寫作成績達到了4。

申請從來不是個人的戰(zhàn)斗，當你的同屆小伙伴們寫作紛紛達到4分以上，錄取分數(shù)自然水漲船高。

總結(jié)一下，申請理工科專業(yè)的同學，如果希望沖刺排名前30的理工科專業(yè)，GRE寫作成績需要達到3.5分。

2. 文科同學GRE作文的平均線是多少?

跟理工科同學不同，文科專業(yè)針對GRE作文成績的要求，通常來自于學校的具體要求。

文科同學在申請時GRE作文成績并不會作為寫作能力的主要參考，因為文科類專業(yè)需要寫Writing Sample，出色的Writing Sample會大大增加被錄取的幾率。 所以小G君建議同學通常在4，5月份著手準備Writing Sample比較好。

但是，如果Writing Sample寫得很好，GRE的作文分數(shù)卻很低，就有造假的嫌疑了。因此，文科專業(yè)的同學，GRE的寫作成績需要達到4分，甚至是4.5分以上，才配得上高水平的Writing Sample。針對社會學，人類學，東亞研究，藝術史，傳媒等等人文專業(yè)的申請才更有競爭力。

小G君的朋友，就是以GRE寫作5.0+優(yōu)秀的Writing Sample，拿到了哥大社會學的錄取。

3. 學校針對GRE的寫作成績

會有硬性的要求嗎?

有部分頂級的學校和項目會針對GRE的寫作成績有硬性要求。

賓大和耶魯?shù)纳飳I(yè)相當重視GRE寫作成績，因為生物專業(yè)需要閱讀大量文獻，撰寫論文。因此這兩個學校針對申請者的GRE寫作要求，都達到5分以上。

GRE寫作成績不能達標的同學，在選校上也要有策略和側(cè)重，不要無謂浪費時間精力。

當然，如果你不想放棄夢校，那就應該抓緊時間，用對的方法暴力提升寫作能力都是迅速提升寫作分數(shù)的利器。

總結(jié)

1. 申請排名前30理工科專業(yè)的同學，GRE寫作成績最好可以達到3.5分;文科專業(yè)同學，最好可以沖刺4.5分。

2. 在選校過程中，一定要確認學校對GRE寫作成績的要求。如果暫時不能達到學校的硬性要求，就要快速提升寫作分數(shù)，否則就只能和夢校說再見了。

GRE寫作滿分范文1

"Our?declining?environment?may?bring?the?people?of?the?world?together?as?no?politician,?philosopher,?or?war?ever?could.??Environmental?problems?are?global?in?scope?and?respect?no?nation's?boundaries.??Therefore,?people?are?faced?with?the?choice?of?unity?and?cooperation?on?the?one?hand?or?disunity?and?a?common?tragedy?on?the?other."??

Environmental?problems?will?require?a?joint?efferct?amoung?people?to?solve,?however,?environmental?problems?may?not?cause?people?to?come?together.??Should?the?problems?continue?for?an?extended?period?of?time?before?any?effert?is?made?to?solve?them,?they?will?reach?a?point?of?no?return?no?matter?how?people?come?together?to?work?on?it.??When?this?happens?there?will?be?increased?shortage?in?our?natural?resouses.??As?supply?of?our?resouces?goes?down?and?demand?remains?the?same?or?goes?up?there?will?be?increased?presure?to?claim?what?resouces?remain.??So?instead?of?people?working?together?to?solve?the?problem,?they?will?be?fighting?for?what's?left?by?the?problem.??

To?solve?this,?people?need?to?come?together?before?the?problem?reaches?a?state?of?no?return.??This?may be?hard?to?do?since?the?effects?of?environmental?problems?are?not?yet?felt?by?a?large?degree?(if?felt?at?all)?by?everyone.??At?this?point?in?time?many?feel?it?is?not?there?problem?to?worry?about?since?it?does?not?immediatly?effect?them.??To?remidy?this?people?should?become?more?aware?of?their?current?environment.?Comments:?

This?response?is?seriously?flawed.??Its?strongest?feature?is?a?fairly?clear?position:??it?agrees?with?the?claim?that?environmental?problems?will?require?cooperation?and?presents?a?scenario?for?what?will?happen?if?there?is?no?cooperation?--?conflict?over?diminishing?resources.??However,?the?writer?offers?little?support?for?that?position.??Threatened?"resources"?and?the?"effects?of?environmental?problems"?are?mentioned?but?not?specified,?and?the?paper?provides?no?examples?of?how?people?might?"come?together"?to?address?the?problem?or?how?they?might?"become?more?aware?of?their?current?environment."??

Some?of?the?sentences?are?worded?clearly?("So?instead?of?people?working?together?"),?but?others?are?so?flawed?by?imprecise?word?choice?that?the?meaning?is?difficult?to?understand:??"t?yet?felt?by?a?large?degree?(if?felt?at?all)?by?everyone."??

Also,?run-on?sentences?(the?first?sentence,?for?example)?and?unclear?pronoun?references?add?to?the?confusion,?reinforcing?the?score?of?2.?

GRE寫作滿分范文2

"Our?declining?environment?may?bring?the?people?of?the?world?together?as?no?politician,?philosopher,?or?war?ever?could.??Environmental?problems?are?global?in?scope?and?respect?no?nation's?boundaries.??Therefore,?people?are?faced?with?the?choice?of?unity?and?cooperation?on?the?one?hand?or?disunity?and?a?common?tragedy?on?the?other."??

In?todays?society?we?spend?to?much?time?addressing?issues?that?will?not?prepare?us?for?the?trials?and?tributlations?facing?our?young?people.??

For?example,?there?is?a?war?on?drugs?that?is?effecting?every?family?in?america,?without?any?consideration?for?race,?gender,?or?enthic?background.??This?country?needs?to?develop?a?systerm?on?how?to?deal?with?this?ongoing?problem?effecting?americans.??There?are?certain?issues?that?constantly?take?center?stage?in?america;?for?example?race?relations?has?return?to?the?horrible?days?of?the?fifiths.??There?is?know?doubt?that?we?are?facing?troubling?times,?and?we?are?not?paying?attention?to?what?is?going?on.?We?need?to?get?back?to?our?value?systerm,?family,?work,?church,?and?responsibility?and?emphasis?to?our?children?the?importancy?of?education?and?respect?of?others.??If?we?provide?a?healthy?model?we?can?help?curve?the?violence?and?mayheam?the?that?is?destroying?our?schools,?cities?and?states.??

Finally,?if?we?are?proud?of?being??americans,?less?take?this?problem?and?do?something?about?it?by?diversity?training?and?multi-?cultural?activities.??

Sincerely,?Comments:?

This?is?not?a?coherent?discussion?of?the?issue.

The?writer?seems?to?define?"environment"?broadly,?though?vaguely,?as?the?"cultural?environment."??While?the?idea?that?environmental?problems?are?fundamentally?cultural?in?origin?could?be?the?basis?for?a?promising?essay,?this?response?does?not?coherently?develop?that?idea.??Moreover,?the?writer?does?not?address?the?issue's?claims?about?international?cooperation.??Instead?the?essay?jumps?from?problem?to?problem?without?adequately?describing?those?problems.??For?example,?"the?war?on?drugs"?is?referred?to?as?a?problem,?but?it?is?not?clear?whether?it?is?law?enforcement's?"war"?on?drugs?or?people's?use?of?drugs?that?is?the?issue.??

Numerous?errors?interfere?with?comprehension,?including?errors?in?word?usage?("emphasis?to?our?children,"?"less?take?this?problem")?and?grammar?("race?relations?has?return?to").??Finally,?the?essay?ends?with?a?closing?("Sincerely")?that?is?more?appropriate?for?a?letter?than?an?analytical?essay.?

GRE寫作滿分范文3

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

The?agrument?is?well-presented,?but?not?thoroughly?well-reasoned.??By?making?a?comparison?of?the?region?of?Forestville,?the?town?with?the?higher?speed?limit?and?therefore?automobile?accidents,?with?the?region?of?Elmsford,?an?area?of?a?lower?speed?limit?and?subsequently?fewer?accidents,?the?argument?for?reducing?Forestville's?speed?limits?in?order?to?decrease?accidents?seems?logical.??

However,?the?citizens?of?Forestville?are?failing?to?consider?other?possible?alternatives?to?the?increasing?car?accidents?after?the?raise?in?speed?limit.??Such?alternatives?may?include?the?fact?that?there?are?less?reliable?cars?traveling?the?roads?in?Forestville,?or?that?the?age?bracket?of?those?in?Elmsford?may?be?more?conducive?to?driving?safely.??It?is?possible?that?there?are?more?younger,?inexperienced,?or?more?elderly,?unsafe?drivers?in?Forestville?than?there?are?in?Elmsford.??In?addition,?the?citizens?have?failed?to?consider?the?geographical?and?physical?terrain?of?the?two?different?areas.??Perhaps?Forestville's?highway?is?in?an?area?of?more?dangerous?curves,?sharp?turns,?or?has?many?intersections?or?merging?points?where?accidents?are?more?likely?to?occur.??It?appears?reasonable,?therefore,?for?the?citizens?to?focus?on?these?trouble?spots?than?to?reduce?the?speed?in?the?entire?area.??Elmsford?may?be?an?area?of?easier?driving?conditions?where?accidents?are?less?likely?to?occur?regardless?of?the?speed?limit.??

A?six-month?period?is?not?a?particularly?long?time?frame?for?the?citizens?to?determine?that?speed?limit?has?influenced?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?the?area.??It?is?mentioned?in?the?argument?that?Elmsford?accidents?decreased?during?the?time?period.??This?may?have?been?a?time,?such?as?during?harsh weather?conditions,?when?less?people?were?driving?on?the?road?and?therefore?the?number?of?accidents?decreased.??However,?Forestville?citizens,?perhaps?coerced?by?employment?or?other?requirements,?were?unable?to?avoid?driving?on?the?roads.??Again,?the?demographics?of?the?population?are?important.??It?is?possible?that?Elmsford?citizens?do?not?have?to?travel?far?from?work?or?work?from?their?home,?or?do?not?work?at?all.??Are?there?more?people?in?Forestville?than?there?were?sic?months?ago???If?so,?there?may?be?an?increased?number?of?accidents?due?to?more?automobiles?on?the?road,?and?not?due?to?the?increased?speed?limits.??Also?in?reference?to?the?activities?of?the?population,?it?is?possible?that?Forestville?inhabitants?were?traveling?during?less?safe?times?of?the?day,?such?as?early?in?the?morning,?or?during?twilight.??Work?or?family?habits?may?have?encouraged?citizens?to?drive?during?this?time?when?Elmsford?residents?may?not?have?been?forced?to?do?so.??

Overall,?the?reasoning?behind?decreasing?Forestville's?speed?limit?back?to?its?original?seems?logical?as?presented?above?since?the?citizens?are?acting?in?their?own?best?interests?and?want?to?protect?their?safety.??However,?before?any?final?decisions?are?made?about?the?reduction?in?speed?limit,?the?citizens?and?officials?of?Forestville?should?evaluate?all?possible?alternatives?and?causes?for?the?increased?number?of?accidents?over?the?six-month?period?as?compared?to?Elmsford.?Comments:?

This?outstanding?response?begins?by?noting?that?the?argument?is?"well?presented."??It?then?proceeds?to?discuss?possible?alternative?explanations?for?the?increase?in?car?accidents?and?provides?an?impressively?full?analysis.??Alternatives?mentioned?are?that???

--?the?two?regions?might?have?drivers?of?different?ages?and?experience;?--?Forestville's?topography,?geography,?cars,?and/or?roads?might????contribute?to?accidents;?

--?six?months?might?be?an?insufficient?amount?of?time?for?determining????that?the?speed?limit?is?linked?to?the?accident?rate;?--?demographics?might?play?a?role?in?auto?accidents;?--?population?and?auto?density?should?be?considered;?and?

--?the?times?of?day?when?drivers?in?the?two?regions?travel?might?be?relevant.??

The?points?are?cogently?developed?and?are?linked?in?such?a?way?as?to?create?a?logically?organized?critique.??Transitions?together?with?interior?connections?create?a?smoothly?integrated?presentation.??For?the?most?part,?the?writer?uses?language?correctly?and?well?and?provides?excellent?variety?in?syntax.??The?minor?flaws?(e.g.,?using?"less"?instead?of?"fewer")?do?not?detract?from?the?overall?high?quality?of?the?critique.??This?is?an?impressive?6?paper.?

想申請Top30，GRE作文成績到底多少分才夠相關文章：